Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

A. From June 1, 1984 to December 31, 2015, the Plaintiff performed melting business at B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant business establishment”).

On November 27, 2018, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the right side of the horse escape certificate No. 4/5 of the fluencies, the conical signboard escape certificate No. 6/7 of the crush,” and on December 5, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on December 5, 2018.

B. On April 15, 2019, the Defendant is a medical opinion with respect to the Plaintiff’s “defensive salt of sonine.” As to the Plaintiff’s “defensive salt of sonine,” it is recognized that the Plaintiff is in a state of injury and disease. From June 19, 1985 to June 11, 2006 at the instant workplace, it is recognized that the proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff and the driver’s license and the driver’s license’s license for nine and six months from June 12, 2006 to December 31, 2015, on the ground that it is difficult to determine that reasonable causal relation between the Plaintiff and the driver’s license for the instant medical care benefit and the driver’s license for the reason that it is difficult to determine that the long-term causal relation between the Plaintiff and the driver’s license for escape and the disease’s age increase is not lower than 5,” and that it is not recognized that there was a change in the duty of injury and disease’s age increase.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant disposition”) regarding partial approval of medical care benefits C.

On May 14, 2019, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee on May 14, 2019, but on the ground that “the instant injury and disease in the medical image data is not observed, and it is not recognized as an increase in the length of the fiber, and this is not an occupational injury and disease.”