beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.07.10 2014노1750

공갈등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment and 80 hours of course in sexual assault treatment programs) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendant is still young, and the Defendant did not repeat the crime while admitting and reflecting the depth of the crime. At the time of 7 years, there are circumstances such as the father and the father, leaving the high school as his father and the father, etc. who did not receive a normal education and care.

However, a number of juvenile protective dispositions due to special larceny, etc., which were punished by a fine due to assault and indecent act by force, and on June 13, 2012, sentenced to a maximum of one year of imprisonment for special larceny, a short of eight months, and on April 19, 2013, each of the crimes of this case was committed even during the repeated period after the execution of punishment was completed.

The victim D repeatedly assaultsd the victim D, and the victim D her sexual organ was forced by force, such as getting the victim D to her sexual organ before her friendship, and the victim H andO, who was taking the victim D and the victim's sexual organ, had the victim her cell phone opened through the cell phone, she got out of the cell phone, and she committed the crime of attack and attempted attack repeatedly against many victims, such as the victim her sexual intercourse and attempted attack.

It is necessary to severely punish the victims in a short-term manner in that they committed multiple crimes, such as theft of credit cards and acquisition of financial benefits by deceiving them as their own credit cards, and arbitrarily disposing of and embezzlement of cellular phone devices kept in custody for the victim J.

Even though the victim was a majority of the victims due to the defendant's crime, it was impossible to agree with the victims until the trial was held, and no particular damage was paid.

In addition, the court below reviewed all of the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, such as the character, conduct, environment, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances before and after the crime.