사기
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds of appeal is that the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, even though the Defendant’s wife revoked the Defendant’s receipt of the instant accident and the J was unaware of the fact that he again received the instant accident, thereby finding the Defendant guilty of the Defendant’s statement without credibility as evidence.
2. The judgment of the court below also argued that the above mistake of facts was the same as the argument of the mistake of facts. On December 3, 201, the date of the accident in this case, D, as its driver, received the accident in this case, and after which D, as its own driver, revoked the receipt of the accident, and D, as its accounting employee, received the accident in this case again with H, and D, as its driver, knew of the occurrence of the accident in this case, after the accident in this case, D, directly called from K to the Mzz Fire Call Center after the accident in this case, followed the receipt of the accident in this case, and concluded that the accident in this case was dealt with normally by the Defendant, and C, as the result of the examination of the witness, was justified in the judgment of the court below in light of the following facts: < Amended by Act No. 113348, Dec. 3, 2011; Act No. 20149, Apr. 1, 2012>