1. On April 17, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000,000 as a fine for a crime of violation of Road Traffic Act in the Busan District Court's Busan District Court's subsidiary branch on April 17, 2009. On November 16, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for the same crime, etc.

On October 9, 2016, the Defendant driven D Poter Cargo under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.174% while under the influence of alcohol leveling from approximately 200 meters away from the construction site adjacent to the construction site of the Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Seoul-do, to the front road, without obtaining a driver’s license.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

2. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a cargo vehicle specified in paragraph (1).

On October 9, 2016, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license as indicated in paragraph 1 of around 20:20 on October 20, 2016, bypassing a three-lane road in front of Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, under the influence of alcohol at 0.174% in alcohol during blood, into the bank of a forest apartment, and re-influencing again, by turning the road into the bank of “ home stept.”

At the time, since it is at night and at a place a three-distance intersection, there was a duty of care to safely drive a driver who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle by accurately manipulating the steering, the rear, and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, while neglecting this, left left the front part of the FSM5 taxi vehicle driven by the victim E (57 aged) located behind the said cargo at the front of the said cargo vehicle, at the seat of the guard box of the Cheong-do Police Station by negligence, while neglecting it, received the front part of the said cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s above occupational duties.