beta
(영문) 대구지방법원안동지원 2017.06.14 2017가단20692

구상금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 371,305,607 and KRW 156,298,030 among the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s KRW 156,298,030 from January 13, 2017 to March 23, 2017.

Reasons

1. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, either there is no dispute between the parties or in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number):

In order to secure the repayment obligation of future loans, the Defendant entered into a credit guarantee agreement with the Plaintiff on six occasions (hereinafter “each of the credit guarantee agreements of this case”) as follows:

(1) The first credit guarantee agreement and the second credit guarantee agreement (1): on August 2, 1998. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 1658, Sep. 7, 2000; Presidential Decree No. 16588, Sep. 1, 2000; Presidential Decree No. 17588, Sep. 16, 2000; Presidential Decree No. 17588, Sep. 16, 2000; Presidential Decree No. 17504, Feb. 2, 2000; Presidential Decree No. 17588, Feb. 29, 2008; Presidential Decree No. 17551, Feb. 2, 2008; Presidential Decree No. 17504, Sep. 16, 200; Presidential Decree No. 17508, Sep. 16, 200>

Each credit guarantee agreement of this case includes ① the amount of money borrowed by the Defendant within the term of guarantee and the damages for delay determined by the Plaintiff from the date of payment on behalf of the Plaintiff to the date of payment on behalf of the Plaintiff, ② the guarantee fee, fine for negligence, penalty, ③ the expenses to be paid by the Plaintiff for the purpose of preserving or executing the claim for reimbursement.

The rate of damages for delay determined by the Plaintiff shall be June 13, 2004.