beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.06.08 2016고단1177

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 21:00 on April 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered the victim D (31) operated in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seodaemun-gu “EPC room” and obstructed the victim’s operation from April 20, 2014 to April 6, 2016, the Defendant: (b) took a bath to the customers who had games in the PC; (c) took a bath to the customers who had games in the PC; and (d) took a bath to the said customers; (d) continued to take a bath to the PC; (e) interfered with the victim’s PC operation by force for about 15 minutes; and (e) interfered with the victim’s PC operation through a restaurant from April 20, 2014 to April 16, 2016, as indicated in the attached Form, as indicated in the victim list of crimes.

2. Violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act;

A. On March 18, 2016, the cancellation of the week of the community service center on March 18, 2016, the Defendant, around 17:00 on March 18, 2016, entered the center of Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, “Seo-gu, 1 Dong community service center, 85” and expressed to the employees of the center that “Isk, skin, skin, and skin, skin, and suicide.”

So-called "satisfy" has been avoided.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

B. On April 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 21:20 on April 19, 2016, the Defendant was able to see that the Defendant was drunkly under the influence of alcohol from the “Samun-gu Seoul Western-ro 112, Sari-ro 112” of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, 201; (b) stated that the police officer “Iskn't have been able to go to the police officer, she was able to have his or her voiceed; and (c) carried a signal monitor and telephone device on the sawa.”

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations on police statements made to D, F, G, H, I, J, and K

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting an offense (Interference with business);