However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 12, 2017, at around 17:30, the Defendant: (a) reported the assault case 112 on the front of the “C” restaurant operated by the Defendant located in the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-gu, D Cheongju-gu, D Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-do, to grasp the circumstances of the instant case; and (b) whether

”라고 말하며 머리를 들이밀고, 오른손으로 위 E의 왼쪽 팔을 때리고, 발로 위 F의 왼쪽 발을 밟고, 오른쪽 무릎을 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with a police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest and report the occurrence of a case, to the list of reported cases, and to report internal investigation;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The elements of sentencing unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including the observation of protection, the order to attend a lecture, and the order to attend a community service order: The nature of the crime is very poor that the police officers in the course of performing their official duties have expressed desire and assault. The elements of sentencing favorable to o: There are no criminal records for the same kind of offense. Recognizing o’s other factors of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, the sentence is