2. The lower court determined that the sentence was imposed in consideration of the following: (a) the Defendant was punished several times for the same type of crime; (b) the Defendant committed a crime during the period of repeated crime; and (c) the frequency of the commission of the crime and the amount of damage; and (c) the victims still wishing to punish the Defendant because a significant amount of damage has not been recovered.

Even when considering the circumstances alleged by the Defendant as the grounds for appeal, the lower court appears to have determined the punishment within a reasonable scope, sufficiently taking into account all the circumstances regarding sentencing.

Furthermore, there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances to change the sentencing of the lower court after the lower judgment.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act because the defendant's appeal is without merit.