위증
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
In light of the factual misunderstanding of the substance of the grounds for appeal and the legal principles, the Defendant stated that the basic floor thickness of the general warehouse was 300 meters, and that the basic floor thickness of the freezing warehouse was changed from the general warehouse to the freezing warehouse at C’s request under the recognition that it was 800 meters, and that the warehouse of this case was changed from the general warehouse to the freezing warehouse. Thus, the Defendant did not make a false statement contrary to memory intentionally.
In relation to the criminal facts stated in the judgment below, the Corporation was executed by J as a slope in the warehouse of this case, but there was a construction work of a sloping sloping sloping and a sloping sloping sloping sloping in G Co., Ltd., and the defendant sloping sloping sloping sloping sloping sloping.
Since it is only a statement, it does not make a false statement contrary to memory intentionally.
With regard to the criminal facts as stated in the judgment below, the reason why the defendant stated to the effect that there is a written agreement that the defendant should construct the basic floor thickness at a 300-meter radius for the first time during the examination of the witness is to construct the basic floor thickness at a 300-meter range first according to the special terms and conditions of the contract for construction works entered into between C and G and the details attached thereto.
This is because it can be seen.
The defendant does not make a false statement against his memory intentionally.
The sentencing of the court below's improper sentencing (the sentencing of 3 million won) is too unreasonable.
According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court as to the assertion of mistake of facts and misapprehension of the legal doctrine as to the grounds for appeal, the following facts are examined: ① The C Representative D becomes aware of G with the Defendant’s introduction and entered into a contract for construction of new warehouse facilities with G and F with the Defendant’s presence on April 15, 2011; ② the contract was entered into at the time of entering into the said contract.
Design drawings prepared by U and matters modified thereafter.