A. 1) The Plaintiff is a corporation in charge of the duties of industry-academia-research cooperation established under the Industrial Education Enhancement and Industry-Academia-Research Cooperation Promotion Act, and the Human Resources Development Service of Korea on September 14, 2010 (hereinafter “Agency”).

) enter into an agreement with the National Human Resources Development Consultative Council and enter into the F Center (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Center”).

) New establishment of a national human resources development consortium project (hereinafter referred to as “instant consortium project”).

(2) Defendant B operated the instant center from around 201 to the head of the instant center, and Defendant C served as the head of the team from September 201 to the head of the team, respectively, and Defendant D and E are an instructor with strong individual training courses at the instant center.

B. The Plaintiff operated the instant consortium business and provided subsidies 1) while operating the instant consortium business, and conducted workplace skill development training for small and medium enterprises workers, etc., and was paid expenses, etc. paid from the Ministry of Employment and Labor in the course of workplace skill development training pursuant to Article 20(1)1 of the Workers’ Vocational Skills Development Act. (2) In addition, the Plaintiff was provided with KRW 2,593,632,463, in total, as expenses incurred in conducting the instant consortium business from around 2011 to December 2013, 201 for training facilities, training equipment, job analysis and analysis, teaching materials development, etc.

C. A disposition to refund subsidies and refunds illegally received to the Plaintiff 1) The Head of the Central Labor Agency of the Central Regional Employment Agency, while conducting the vocational training course, shall make a false report after performing the different courses from the reported process (hereinafter “instant 1 act”).

(2) A false report is made after the number of persons who did not attend the training course was falsely present and disposed of (hereinafter “instant second act”).

(3) In the instant case, it shall be deemed that the training was completed even after conducting less than 80 per cent of recognized training hours (hereinafter referred to as “the training”).