However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 9, 2018, the Defendant was asked of personal information from E, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report from 112, on June 21:40, 201, “A police officer of the Daejeon Police Station D police station of the Daejeon who was called to the site,” and who was asked of personal information from E, who was dispatched to the site on June 9, 2018;

The gue gue, “A Chewing ...........”, the right chest part of the above E is at one time by left hand, and the drinking has continued to be the face of E.

As a result, the defendant assaulted police officers, thereby hindering police officers from performing their legitimate duties on handling reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest and report cases

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The execution of a sentence is suspended by taking into account favorable circumstances, such as the observation of protection, community service order, and order to attend a lecture, and the fact that it is not good to commit a crime by exercising direct violence against the police with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, but there is no record of punishment other than a fine for one time, and a mistake is divided and reflected;