Since the court below asserted that the defendant was in a state of mental disorder at the time of each of the crimes in this case, the court below did not make any judgment on this issue. However, according to the records, it cannot be seen that the defendant was in a state of mental disorder at the time of each of the crimes in this case. Thus, the above error of the court below did not err

In addition, the part of the appellate brief submitted by the Defendant stating to the effect that “the error of fact is corrected through the examination of witness” is unlawful on the ground that the part of the lower judgment is unlawful on the ground that it is not a legitimate ground of appeal.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.