If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On April 201, 2009, the defendant's name in the name of the news release room operated by the victim C of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was Dominant from "D" operated by the victim C in Gangnam-gu, and the counter customer did not pay the drinking value to the outside of the business place as it is with the counter customer. E, the mother of the C, urged the above customer to pay the drinking value by telephone, but asked the above customer to transfer the drinking value to the above-mentioned person who was accompanied by the above customer.

At around 06:00 on April 200, the following day, the Defendant paid KRW 170,000 in advance, and received a request from E to change the drinking value received from customers while drinking alcoholic beverages and drinking alcoholic beverages.

이에 피고인은 “이 씨발 이놈의 집구석은 왜 술값을 우리 애한테 받아 오라고해. 이 씨발 다 죽여버려”라고 고함의 지르면서 카운터로 뛰어나와 “씨발 좆같은 가게 다 부숴 버린다.”라고 소리를 지르며 그곳 냉장고에 들어있던 맥주를 꺼내 바닥에 던져 깨버리고 카운터 전화기와 집기 등을 집어 던져 부수고, 손님들에게 “야 이 씨발놈들아, 뭘 쳐다봐, 덤벼, 이 씨발놈들아, 이 가게에 있는 개새끼들 모두 죽여 버린다.” 라고 큰 소리를 쳐 손님들이 노래방에 들어오지 못하게 하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property and interfered with the victim E’s musical business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Partial entry of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement C (No. 203 pages) Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;