beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.04.04 2012고단4343

위조사문서행사등

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants were self-boomed with D from around 1988 to August 16, 201, Seoul Mapo-gu E 402.

1. When the Defendants conspired to act on January 14, 201 and donated No. 402 to F, a son, and completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of F, the Defendants obtained false data and obtained the false data from the owner of the said 402 to make an application for the registration of ownership transfer as to the said 402, around October 10, 2002, the Defendants obtained the signature from the owner of the said 402 in the indication column of real estate under the title of "Seoul Enpo E 402", "Seoul Enpo E 402,00,000 won (150,000 won)", "D", "B", "B" to the lessor, and printed it out to the tenant column, and then obtained the signature from the owner of the said Do under the name of the former Do and the seal affixed by the owner of the said Do as if he had the capacity to read it by deceiving other tenants and the seal affixed to B.

On August 16, 2011, the Defendants submitted to the public service center of the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Western District Court a written application for the order of lease registration (Seoul Western District Court 201Kao1362) accompanied by the forged lease contract (Seoul Western District Court 201Kao1362) and exercised it.

2. The Defendants attempted to commit fraud, using the forged lease contract, etc., to invite the victim FF, who is the new owner of the above 402, to receive the deposit for the lease on a deposit basis. On January 30, 2012, the Defendants filed a lawsuit with the Seoul Western District Court ordering the Plaintiff to pay KRW 150 million as the deposit money for the lease deposit against the said 402, with the Plaintiff B and the Defendant as F, and then submitted the forged lease contract to the said court as if the registered lease contract was duly completed, thereby deceiving the said court from the victim.