However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 20:00 on May 13, 2014, the Defendant took a protective measure at the Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho Police Station C box, which is located in Seocho-gu Seoul, and was drunkly in the police box, provided that “Chewing feass, she will die and live in prison.” Accordingly, the Defendant recommended the Defendant to have a slope affiliated with the Seoul Seocho Police Station C box return to the Defendant’s house, she saw the Defendant to look back to the house, and she saw the Defendant to read “Chewing feass, she will die and die, and live in prison,” and she took a bath to read “D’s chest back to the Defendant’s house.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime (the choice of imprisonment because of a large number of criminal records related to violence and of the same kind of records)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confession and reflect, and considering the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding the fine);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;