All appeals filed by B and prosecutor are dismissed.

A. Defendant B (1) misunderstanding of the facts or misunderstanding of the legal principles

In the absence of a false statement contrary to memory, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine or by misapprehending the legal doctrine, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2) The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a term of six months) is too unreasonable.

B. A prosecutor - The court below acquitted Defendant A of the facts charged of this case by misunderstanding the fact that Defendant - In light of the possibility that Defendant misunderstanding of the facts against Defendant A was phoneed to F with his wife and other family's cell phone, details of the use of credit cards by Defendant and F, credibility of F testimony, etc., even if Defendant 1 was fully recognized that the fact that Defendant instigated F to commit perjury from October 16, 2017 to November 4 of the same year was sufficiently recognized, the court below acquitted Defendant 1 of this case.

2. Determination

A. Determination as to Defendant B 1) Determination as to the assertion of mistake of facts