On September 15, 2010, the Defendant is the USF employee in the fixed number of the CCR located in the USF shooting range, who was working in the FPC operated by the victim E in Dongducheon-si, and even if he received money from the victim under the pretext of job placement training, he did not have the intent or ability to find the victim's children in the Defendant's workplace in the Defendant's workplace even though he did not receive the money from the victim under the pretext of job placement training, the Defendant made a false statement that "it is necessary to find her children in the C shooting range he works in the country. It is necessary to find her employment." The Defendant acquired 27 million won from the victim to the head of the Tong in his name as school under the pretext of teaching expenses from the victim, i.e., by taking over 27 million won from the victim to the post office under the name of the victim, from that time until April 25, 2013, by taking the victim's total 1580,000 won under the pretext of investment funds or funds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to E, G, H, I, J, and K;

1. Lritten statements;

1. Each remittance statement, each borrowing certificate, each cash receipt, and each statement of evidence, regardless of whether the name in the evidence list is somewhat modified, the statement of remittance, each borrowing certificate, each cash receipt, and each cash custody certificate submitted shall be collectively referred to as the statement of remittance, loan certificate, and cash custody certificate submitted. Account number, necessary document statement, name of suspect, copy of the real estate lease contract, copy of each suspect's post office account transaction statement,

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to the verification of tobacco business), investigation reports (a written statement attached to the injured party), investigation reports (a loan certificate attached to the L) and investigation reports;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the scope of applicable sentences for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes: The final scope of applicable sentences recommended by sentencing guidelines from January to 15: From January 1 to 4 years; [criminal type] the general fraud criteria among the fraud group.