Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On December 28, 2015, around 01:35, the Defendant: (a) requested a victim C (n, 27) to drink alcohol together in the vicinity of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B building; (b) was refused; (c) the Defendant, having a conflict with the victim C with the victim C, was scambling the victim C’s head debt; and (d) the Defendant assaulted by scambling the victim D (n, 25 years old) with the victim’s head debt at the time when the victim D (n, scam, 25 years old) was scambied; and (c) the Defendant was scambling against another person’s will by exercising a tangible force against another person’s will; and (d) the background leading up to the dispute at the time, the Defendant can be evaluated as assaulting the victim’

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written statement (C, D, E, and F);

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to G;

1. Cybal images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (Czeb analysis);

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act and Article 260 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;