If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

At around 23:30 on December 11, 201, the Defendant, along with other employees, took a drinking at the “D” middle-gu restaurant operated by the victim C in Seojin-gu, Seojin-gu, Seoul, and thought to prepare entertainment expenses after drinking alcohol with other employees, and then stolen the Defendant’s shoulder 1,93,000 won in cash located adjacent to the carcter by taking advantage of the gaps in which the surveillance of the victim was neglected.

Summary of Evidence

1. Investigation record of the criminal suspect against the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order was that the Defendant was absent on two consecutive occasions ( September 11, 2013, September 25, 2013) on the date of trial, and revised the trial date without the attendance of the Defendant pursuant to Articles 458(2) and 365 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

According to the above evidence, in light of the facts found in the judgment of the defendant, and the circumstances of this case, the fines specified in the summary order cannot be deemed to be heavy, and thus the defendant shall be sentenced to the punishment as set forth in the order.