If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. Around 22:06 on April 11, 2016, the Defendant insultd the victim by openly insulting the victim, including the victim, on the ground that the vehicle driven by the victim D (n, 28 years of age) was driven in the direction of the Defendant, blocking the vehicle of the said victim, blocking the vehicle of the said victim, and fluoring the car, and fluor, even if the victim was requested to turn on by the injured party, while the said victim’s fluor and fluor request was made, the Defendant fluenced the victim by “fluoring fluor” and “a fluoring fluoring fluort” and “a fluoring fluoring fluoring fluoring fluoring fluor.”

2. The defendant interfered with the performance of official duties to the victim G (27 years old) who is a funeral belonging to the G (27 years old), who was dispatched after receiving a report from 112 to the effect that the defendant obstructed the way at the time and place specified in the above paragraph 1, at the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station F District, on the date and place specified in the above paragraph 1;

In doing this Chewing, the victim's face was strongly pushed with both hands, and the victim's breath continued to be spathd with breath, and assaulted such as spathing.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases and the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of statutes on respective police statements made to D, E, G, and H;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. The sentence like the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances as to the sentencing reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, and other conditions of the sentencing as shown in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relation, and circumstances before and after the commission of the crime.

- The nature of each of the crimes of this case does not correspond to those of the defendant. However, there are some points to consider the circumstances leading to each of the crimes of this case, and the police officer concerned in the part obstructing the performance of official duties appeals against the defendant's prior action. - The defendant has no history of criminal punishment. - The defendant is against his wrong.