beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.07 2016고단2756

공무집행방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 26, 2016, the injured Defendant: (a) around 00:52 on March 26, 2016, 2016, when the victim E (31 years of age) was waiting for a taxi in front of the Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul D Building; and (b) when waiting for a taxi in the aftermath of the taxi, the injured Defendant saw the victim’s face by cutting off the victim’s head debt with the victim’s own hand, and caused the victim’s injury, such as salt, tension, tension, etc., of the part in which the details of the victim’s blue value need to be treated for approximately 10 days on the left side of the victim.

2. On March 26, 2016, at around 01:05, the Defendant, at the place indicated in paragraph (1). On March 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed that, upon receiving a request from a slope G to support the said violence case, H expressed his desire to “this fab must go to the front seat of the patrol fab,” the Defendant arrested the Defendant as a criminal suspect for the assault case; and (b) assaulted the said H’s left fabs to walk on the back seat of the patrol fab.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E, I, and H;

1. Damage photographs and written diagnosis [the defendant asserts to the effect that he was in a state of mental disorder or mental disorder by stating that he was unable to memory under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of this case. The records show that the defendant was in a state of mental disorder or mental disorder. The defendant is recognized as having drinking alcohol at the time of the crime of this case, but it does not seem that he had no or weak ability to discern things or make decisions. Thus, the above argument is rejected.] The above argument is not applicable to the law.

1. Article 257(1) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of each fine.