A. The Plaintiff’s claim 1) The Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff, etc., and the Seoul Southern District Court rendered the following judgment (2009Gahap12963) on November 4, 2010 (209Gahap12963).

1. The Defendant:

A. The non-party MIB consulting 13.5 billion won and 9% per annum from November 28, 2007 to February 28, 2008; 19% per annum from the next day to June 25, 2009; and 20% per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment;

B. The plaintiff and the non-party A (the plaintiff's employee) shall provide the IMA non-consulting services, respectively.

Of the money stated in paragraph (1), 5.24,740,00 won and 5.1,844,000 won among them shall be paid from May 25, 2007; 122,896,00 won from November 28, 2007; 5% per annum from November 4, 2010 to the date of full payment; and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment.

2. The defendant's remaining claims against the plaintiff and A are dismissed.

2) The Plaintiff, the Defendant, and the Plaintiff appealed, and the Seoul High Court sentenced the instant judgment (No. 2011Na261) on June 7, 2012. The Plaintiff appealed and appealed (Supreme Court Decision 2012Da74260). The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the Defendant, which constituted the following order, shall be revoked. With respect to KRW 3,918,55,00 for each of the Defendant, and KRW 3,826,383,000 for KRW 3,826,383,00,00 from May 25, 2007, KRW 92,172,000, the Seoul High Court shall have received 5% per annum from November 28, 2007 to June 7, 2012, and KRW 200 per annum 20,000 from the next day to the date of full payment (Supreme Court Decision 201Da36816, Jun. 2, 2016).