However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Between June 16, 2016 and around 17:00 on June 2016, the Defendant: (a) if the Defendant: (b) was at the display stand in front of the “D E” located in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, brought about five series of sound (up to an amount equivalent to KRW 4,000 in the market price); (c) around 02:00 on February 7, 2018, the Defendant brought about five series of sound (up to KRW 4,000 in the “G” located in the Busan-gu, Busan-gu, and (d) up to 17:0,000, the Defendant held the key to the storage of goods stored in the head of the Victim H and held the goods stored in the Victim H’s bank’s bank’s market price (up to KRW 71,700,000,000 in the face value of KRW 710,000,00 in the market price (up to KRW 71).

From the date of June 2016 to February 7, 2018, the total sum of KRW 246,000 from the victim E, I, and H was stolen over 10 times as shown in the [Attachment Table (1] from the date of June 2016 to February 7, 2018.

2. On January 24, 2018, the Defendant took up only 24 hours of use fees of 9,000 won at the making soup room of the instant case as stated in paragraph (1) around 12:0 on January 24, 2018, and then, soup room of the instant case, the Defendant was aware that the Defendant was operating by checking the key of the goods stored at the time of the customer’s withdrawal and settling additional service fees, knowing that it was operated by the method of collecting and returning the key of the goods stored by the customer, he would be exempted from paying additional service fees of the instant case exceeding the amount already paid by the Defendant, and around 02:30 on February 7, 2018, he did so, making so so, and making soup the key of H’s goods stored in the instant case as described in paragraph (1), as if the Defendant returned the key of the goods stored in the instant carter to the said employee for 10 days, and then, made so doing.