2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). There is no new circumstance to change the sentence of the lower court in the trial. In full view of the reasons for sentencing as stated by the lower court, comprehensively taking into account various sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, amount of damage, circumstances of the crime, method of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence imposed by the lower court was conducted within the reasonable scope of discretion, and is not harsh.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.