When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one shall, in using and managing the means of access, acquire or borrow the means of access, receive, request or promise to receive or provide compensation, or keep, deliver or distribute the means of access.

Nevertheless, around May 20, 2015, the Defendant lent the means of access to the bank account opened in the name of the Defendant through Kwikset service instead of lending the passbook to the person who is not in charge of the name in front of the Kwikset Office in Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu. B. The Defendant lent the means of access to the bank account in the name of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the specifications of transactions of automation machinery;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 49(4)1 and 6(3)1 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is against the defendant, and there is no record of crime other than punishment once a fine is imposed for a crime of double-class, and the defendant is determined as the sentence in consideration of the economic profit, etc. earned by the crime of this case.