Nevertheless, the Defendant operated two vehicles not covered by mandatory insurance through the following nine times in total:

① On August 21, 2011, in front of the Diplomatic Association in Jung-gu, Daegu on September 23:35, 201, < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23538, Oct. 13, 2011; Presidential Decree No. 23448, Oct. 3, 2011; Presidential Decree No. 2420, Oct. 31, 201; Presidential Decree No. 24248, Oct. 25, 2011; Presidential Decree No. 24425, Oct. 31, 2011; Presidential Decree No. 2420, Oct. 24, 2011; Presidential Decree No. 24448, Oct. 25, 2011; Presidential Decree No. 24477, Jul. 31, 2012>

2. According to the records of judgment, the charge of the above facts charged pertains to N (N, O, hereinafter “N”) with a similar name, not to Defendant A (hereinafter “A”).

On December 18, 2014, the prosecutor filed a summary order of KRW 700,00,000 with N as the Defendant at the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court on the charge of the above crime. However, the prosecutor mistakenly stated N's foreigner registration number as A, and the above court issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 (201 high-ranking9661) to N on January 19, 2015 as the violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and entered the foreigner registration number as D.

If so, the effect of the indictment and the summary order is limited to the public prosecutor and the N designated by the court as the defendant, and in the case of A, only the foreigner registration number has been entered as an error in the indication, the prosecution and the summary order are not effective

In fact, upon the prosecutor's request on July 21, 2015, the court corrected the foreigner registration number of the above summary order from "P to " Q", and thereafter, N in the formal trial procedure upon N's request for delivery of a written decision on the correction of court records.