beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.01.22 2015고단3240

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2015 Highest 3240" is a person who is engaged in driving a CSP car.

On June 2, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver’s license of the said car, and driven the said car at a speed from the four-lanes of the front direction D located in Daejeon metropolitan-gu to the distance of agricultural, fishery, and fishing, and neglected the duty of the front direction while changing the vehicle into the two-lanes, while neglecting the duty of the front direction, the Defendant damaged the victim’s G SM5’s left part of the car of the FF (41 tax) driving, which is driven at the two-lanes of the said SM5 car, to the front part of the right side of the said SM car, and at the same time, damaged the said SM5 car to the victim for repair costs5,080,097.

"2015 Highest 4335"

1. The accused is a person engaging in driving of C SP car in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Violation of Road Traffic Act, Violation of Road Traffic Act, and Guarantee of Automobile Compensation.

On October 15:52, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver’s license for a motor vehicle, and proceeded to the speed of about 20 kilometers from the right edge to the right edge of the Han Bank distance in front of the four-lane in Daejeon Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu.

At the same time, there was a vehicle waiting for signal signals in accordance with the front line, and as a driver, there was a duty of care to drive safely by checking well the left and right of the front line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s negligence of failing to perform his duties at the time of the preceding week, which led to the Defendant’s failure to take part in the back of the victim HH driving in the front of the signal in the front bank, and continued to take part in the back of the said Switzerland car into account as the front part of the said Switzerland car. As such, the Defendant’s failure to perform his duties at the time of the preceding week is the front part of the vehicle.