보증금반환
All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant) against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) are dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be the expenses for appeal.
1. The Plaintiffs filed a claim for the return of the lease deposit, etc. from the first instance court to the principal lawsuit, and the Defendant filed a claim for the delivery of building and the return of unjust enrichment as a counterclaim. The first instance court partly accepted the principal claim, and dismissed all the counterclaim claims.
Accordingly, since only the defendant appealed against the part against the defendant among the part concerning the principal lawsuit in the judgment of the court of first instance, the subject of adjudication in this court is limited to the part against the defendant among the principal lawsuit.
2. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the dismissal of the corresponding parts of the judgment of the court of first instance or the defendant's assertion emphasizing at the trial of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be cited including the abbreviation thereof
(However, the part of the counterclaim claim, which is not the scope of this Court’s trial). Defendant D’s “Defendant D” of the judgment of the first instance court is both “Codefendant D of the first instance trial.”
3. The defendant asserts that the instant entrustment contract constitutes a self-management-based rental management contract, which is similar to a lease contract between the defendant and the Fund for the settlement of disputes, and the defendant merely has the power to make a kind of sub-lease to the Fund for the settlement of disputes, and that the Fund for the settlement of disputes did not have the power to enter into
The principal content of the contract of this case is that the F Co., Ltd. entered into the contract of this case with the defendant and entered into the contract of this case in accordance with the contract of this case is that the defendant explicitly entered the contract of this case as a lessor. ② The contract of this case is that one of the parties uses and profit from the other party's object, and the other party pays a rent for it. The contract of this case is not originally planned that the L Co., Ltd. F Co., Ltd. will use and profit from each of the real estate of this case.