Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

At around 05:40 on March 28, 2015, the Defendant demanded the victim to undergo further alcohol at the D restaurant operated by the victim C in Daegu-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant heard the victim’s speech that “the time can not be delayed,” and C, “I would like to calculate the victim’s volume of drinking her, “I would like to have more drinking her, her drinking, and her drinking her drinking, but she would have her drinking her drinking,” and “I would like to she would like to face the victim’s drinking value after the police officer so called “I would like to her drinking and her drinking, without a police officer’s request for returning home,” and I would like to interfere with the victim’s business operation by force, such as “I would like to have her sound and her drinking, and it would interfere with the victim’s business operation by force.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;