When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 16, 2016, the Defendant arranged the employment of three foreigners of the monb nationality of the steel mon, who did not have the status of sojourn eligible to engage in job-seeking activities, such as E, F, and G, introduced from Dondo Donnam-do Donnam-do Don, to C, who operated the mamon farm.

In collusion with D, the Defendant, including this, arranged employment of foreigners who do not have the status of stay to engage in job-seeking activities, such as the list of offenses, from November 2014 to February 2, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. Each photograph (the list Nos. 59,65);

1. An abstract of the contents of storage of mermos;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on results of digital evidence analysis;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 10 of the relevant Article of the Immigration Control Act and Article 18 (4) of the same Act (in the case of crimes, numbers 1 through 9, 16 through 18, 21, 23, 26 through 29, and 31, Article 30 of the Criminal Act shall be added, inclusive);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;