2. The judgment of the court below does not change any special circumstances or circumstances that are newly considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below was rendered, while the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of assault committed in Seoul Western District Court on May 4, 2018 and became final and conclusive on July 20, 2018. The above crime and the crime of assault committed in this case are all committed against the child who used the way to commit violence without any justifiable reason and are not good in light of the object and method of crime, etc. Meanwhile, the defendant has no record of being punished for violent crimes before 2017, and there is no record of being punished for violence-related crimes, and the equity with the case where the judgment is rendered simultaneously with the crime of assault committed in the judgment of the court below which became final and conclusive, and there is no special circumstance or circumstance that can be newly considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below was rendered. The above crime is not reversed for the reason that the defendant newly committed a crime after the judgment of the court below became final and conclusive, and Article 37 of this case.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, the sentence imposed by the court below is deemed appropriate, and it seems unfair because it is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.