사기
A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months and by imprisonment for not more than three months for the crimes of No. 2 in the holding.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] On November 12, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for fraud at the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 29, 2014, and the parole period was expired on March 30, 2016 at the Net Prison. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 27517, Aug. 17, 2016>
[Criminal facts] 2018 Highest 134
1. On July 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the mutual infinite coffee shop in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, the Defendant: (b) granted the victim C a good share of the sports debate; (c) granting a lot of profits when investing the purchase cost of sports soil; and (d) granting 100% of the principal as profits.
“The phrase “ was false.”
However, in fact, the defendant had been causing more than KRW 30 million due to sports discussions and had been responsible for the debt equivalent to KRW 300 million, and even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to return the principal and the profits to the injured party after making an investment in the sports territory.
In doing so, Defendant 1, as seen above, received a total of KRW 49,30,00 from the injured party eight times from the injured party, including receiving KRW 10,00 from the injured party to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (E) in the name of the same day from the injured party, from September 16, 2017, by remitting KRW 49,30,000 from September 16, 2017.
"2018 Highest 177"
2. The Defendant, around June 2013, at an irregular officetel located near the entrance of the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (a) made it clear that the victim F would have a high probability of winning the earth and sand of sports to lend money; and (b) made it clear that the victim F would have a high probability of winning the earth and sand of sports to lend money; and (c) in addition to the principal, the amount equivalent to 10 to 15% of the profit
“The phrase “ was false.”
However, in fact, the defendant does not have a well-being of the result of a sports game or have a device to raise the probability of winning the game, and does not have a law to do so, even if a sports competition was held, it was not able to pay a large amount of profit, and he borrowed money from or invested in a large number of people.