However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

The Defendant and B conspired to prevent the act of fraud of the Internet by purchasing the lending company and the passbook with largephones. The Defendant and B, “2017 Go-dan 2410,” all of the property owned by the Internet gambling, and by purchasing the lending company from the lending company.

1. No person who violates the telecommunications business shall open a mobile communications terminal device which concludes a contract for the provision of telecommunications services in the name of another person on the condition of providing or lending funds, and use the telecommunications service provided to such mobile communications terminal device;

Nevertheless, around February 14, 2017, the Defendant and B purchased a core chips to mobile phones E, which are subscribed to in the name of a person without a name, while 170,000 won to a person without a name, around February 14, 2017, in the vicinity of the secondhand market in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Yang Jae-dong, according to the above public offering, and used it for committing the crime of fraud, etc. of Internet goods from around that time to March 13, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant and B conspired to use telecommunications services provided to the mobile communications terminal device by opening the mobile communications terminal device that concludes a contract for the provision of telecommunications services in another person's name.

2. On February 16, 2017, the Defendant and B told the victim F (the mobile phone number G) to contact with the victim F (the victim’s cell phone number G) at an influence place and to the effect that “I want to work, I will send the passbook first.”

However, in fact, the Defendant and B did not have the intent to engage in the foregoing activities by organizing the team, and there was only the idea to prepare a presidential passbook necessary for committing fraud, so even if they received the passbook from the injured party, they did not have the intent or ability to allow the injured party to perform the foregoing activities.

Nevertheless, the Defendant and B are as above.