2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16093, Jan. 1,

On March 2, 2016, the defendant, operated by the defendant in Daegu-gu around 22:10 on March 2, 2016, the defendant received 80,000 won from the police officer belonging to the police department D department of Daegu-gu Police Station, who pretended to be a customer to control sexual traffic, as the price for sexual traffic, and entered E, who is a sexual traffic woman, as a room with the above police officer, to have sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant has arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to detection and reporting of cases in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - although having the same kind of force, there are no criminal records other than fines on one occasion, the intent to block recidivism by operating the shop - Other factors of sentencing specified in the records of this case, including the defendant's age, sexual conduct, health status, home environment, motive, means, consequence, etc.