A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and for one year, each of the defendants B.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.

The Defendants are in line with each other.

around August 23:45, 2019, Defendants were to move to D's taxi at the front taxi stops of the Dong-gu Seoul Building in Ansan-si.

Accordingly, Defendant A assaulted Defendant A, such as at the time of her bucking with the above D, and assaulted E that scambling it.

(D) On August 9, 2019, the Defendant committed assault against D and E on the same day, and around 00:05 on August 9, 2019, Defendant B took a bath to police officers who were dispatched after receiving a report of assault; Defendant B took the chest of G, a police officer belonging to the Ansan-gu Police Station F box, and arrested Defendant B as a flagrant offender of assault and assault, and carried the Defendant’s left arms and body in hand, carried the Defendant’s hand, carried the Defendant’s arms and body in hand, pushed the Defendant’s arms belonging to the same police box, sealed the police officers assigned to the same police box, and pushed the chest.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to criminal investigation.

2. On August 9, 2019, at around 00:05, Defendant A: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender committing an obstruction of performance of official duties at the front of the instant C building; (b) was boomed by B; and (c) was boomed by the police officer’s left her tock.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement concerning H, G, and D;

1. Each written statement of E, I and J;

1. Photographs related to the case;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal report (a video analysis made by a participating police officer), a criminal investigation report (victim E telephone conversations), and a criminal investigation report (CCTV image);

1. Article 136 (1) A of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act; Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the commercial concurrence (Defendant B);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A);

1. A majority of police officers with reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act are the community service order (defendant A).