Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Although the Defendant’s judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is against the instant crime, the Defendant has already been punished several times as the same kind of force, and the nature of the instant crime is not good, and the act of arranging sexual traffic is highly harmful to the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing the women’s sex, and thus, there is a need to strictly punish the party who operates an illegal sexual traffic establishment in order to prevent such act. In addition, taking into account the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, criminal records, family environment, the background, means and method of the instant crime, and circumstances before and after the instant crime and arguments, etc., the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment and penalty collection) is appropriate, and it cannot be deemed unreasonable.