If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On January 9, 2016, the Defendant was arrested a flagrant offender due to a violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint assault) from an slope E belonging to the D District Unit of the police station, which was called upon after being drunked in the B B B head of the Chungcheongnam-do, B heading around 50, 2016, and called upon after receiving a report of friendship C, etc., the Defendant committed an act that seems to have been spatied and spatied into E, and threatened E by committing an act that seems to have been spatiated and to have been spatiated into E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer against F, G, H, I, and J;

1. Application of each police statement statute to E, C, J, K, and L;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the Defendant’s fault seriously, and is a criminal act committed by drinking alcohol, the degree of intimidation is not limited, there is no past record of criminal punishment, and other conditions of sentencing as prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act.