except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The crime on September 6, 2013;

A. At around 08:00 on September 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened a corrective entrance in front of the entrance of the hospital run by the victim C of the victim C of the second and the second floor; (b) opened the entrance; and (c) intruded into the structure managed by the victim.

B. The Defendant: (a) entered the above date, at the above place, into the D Hospital; and (b) cut off the market value, which was under the influence of the president room shock.

2. The crime on September 14, 2013;

A. At around 15:00 on September 14, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened a corrective entrance in front of the entrance of the said D Hospital; and (b) intruded into the structure managed by the victim.

B. The Defendant: (a) thief entered into the D hospital at the time and place described in paragraph (2) at the time and place specified in paragraph (a) and (b) 13 thiefs with an unfolded amount at the market price, which is the victim-owned shocks under the D hospital; and (c) cut off with 13 stiefs.

3. A crime on September 27, 2013;

A. On September 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened a corrective entrance in front of the entrance of the said D Hospital on September 27, 2013; and (b) intruded into the structure managed by the victim.

B. The theft Defendant: (a) entered into the D hospital at the time, place, such as the date, time, and place described in paragraph 3(a); and (b) cut off the market value, which was the victim’s possession in custody, with three handbaths for treatment purposes in the latter’s line for treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (Influence of structure, Selection of Imprisonment), and Article 329 of the Criminal Act for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act reflects the error of the defendant, there is no previous conviction exceeding the fine, and currently there is no previous conviction.