2. In light of the fact that the Defendant caused the instant accident by negligence that the Defendant violated the signal and neglected his duty of care in front time, etc., and caused the injury to the victim, it is necessary to pronounce strict punishment to the Defendant.

However, in full view of all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of the Defendant, including the first offender, the Defendant’s violation of the instant crime, and the payment of KRW 27 million to the victim, etc., such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, accident circumstance, and circumstances after the crime, etc., even if considering the above circumstances, it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unfeasible and unfair.

The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.