1. Interference with business;

A. On February 2, 2014, the Defendant, while under the influence of the Victim C, operated by the victim C in Mayang-si, Manyang-si, Manyang-si, Manyang-si, Manyang-si, and without any particular reason, she opened the victim with a large voice of “Fraudd, Done, Chewing, Chewing, and Man-si, Man-si, Man-si, Man-si, Man-si, Man-si, Man-si, and Man-gu, Man-si, Man-

B. On November 15, 198, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol in the above D around 21:30 of the same year, she opened a large sound to E, a customer, “I am unable to do so,” without any justifiable reason, and thereby interfered with the victim’s business operation by force by avoiding disturbance from the above shop.

C. On the 22th day of the same month, the Defendant, while drunking in the above D around 11:10, and without any particular reason, obstructed the Defendant’s business operation by force by leaving the victim’s audience with a large amount of sound, “Fraud, dysium, yachts, chewings, and sussiums,” and preventing them from entering the said places.

On the 22th day of the same month, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol in the above D on the 14:00, and without any particular reason, obstructed the victim’s business operation by force by leaving the victim with large sounds of “as the Defendant,” “at least 30 minutes of a large volume of household effects on the floor of 30 minutes, customers who enter the said house,” and without any justifiable reason.

2. On November 22, 2014, at around 11:10 on November 2, 2014, the Defendant damaged the property by destroying the electric stude equivalent to 70,000 won at the market price as the victim F, who f, f, f, f, and f, f, f, f, of the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to C, F, and E;

1. G 1. The statement;