beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.11.04 2016고단2202

사기

Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;

However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the above sentence against Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

D On August 29, 2014, the Suwon District Court was sentenced to one year of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. on September 6, 2014, which became final and conclusive on September 6, 2014. On March 31, 2016, the Suwon District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, which became final and conclusive on April 8, 2016.

The Defendants, using a forged employment certificate and a false lease contract with Defendant A, who is an employee with the workplace of Defendant A using a forged employment certificate and a false lease contract with Defendant B, decided to take overall control over the crime, including the act of taking over the name of the lessee, Defendant B, the lessor, the act of forging the certificate of employment, the act of forging the certificate of employment, the act of assisting Defendant C, and the act of assisting Defendant C, and the act of preparing a false apartment lease contract.

On April 23, 2013, at the J Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in Kusan-si I, the Defendants prepared a false apartment lease contract as if Defendant A leased the Kuwon-si K Apartment 106 Dong 2102 from Defendant B’s wife H with a deposit of KRW 22,00,00,000, and as if Defendant C and D leased for two years during the lease period, and forged Defendant C and D’s certificate of employment that Defendant A is in office at Egrari-si.

Since then, around April 25, 2013, Defendant A submitted a false apartment charter contract and a false certificate of employment with the employees in charge of the loan at the NAFF 279 Co., Ltd., Ltd., the defendant A applied for a loan based on a real pre-lease contract and applied for a loan as if he were to use the loan as a pre-lease deposit.

Defendants G. G.