2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. In around October 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a solar base supply agreement with the Defendant, a construction contractor of the above solar power plant, to supply the Defendant 4.3 MW system linkage 9 solar energy generation in the modern Heavy Industries (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the content that, while providing engineering support at the construction site of the nearby solar power plant at Ansando (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

B. On March 27, 2013, according to the instant contract, the Plaintiff supplied 9 solar solar base base to the Defendant’s construction site, and around May 2013, the Plaintiff received payment from the Defendant of KRW 26,235,00 (including KRW 2,650,000 x 9, added taxes) for the engineering cost of Mater.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 1-3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff should additionally pay KRW 26,235,000 to the Plaintiff, as the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with nine solar solar base in accordance with the instant contract around July 2013.

However, the above evidence submitted by the plaintiff and the statement of Gap evidence Nos. 4 through 7 alone are insufficient to acknowledge the above facts of the plaintiff's assertion, and there is no other evidence to prove it. Thus, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.