On August 24, 2016, around 22:15, the Defendant: (a) driven a victim C or D with a passenger on board the victim C or D in the vicinity of the above shooting distance in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seongbuk-gu as of August 24, 2016; (b) made the Defendant a horse to the back seat of the 22:30 on the same day, boarding the said D on the back seat with a large amount of drum; and (c) made the Defendant “I

" and became a vision for the victims who are passengers on the ground that they were forced to do so."

For the foregoing reason, the Defendant: (a) caused the injury to the victim C by dumping the ebbbbbage of the victim C in hand on the ground that the victims were bad after getting off the taxi; and (b) caused the injury to the victim C on a hand, such as the left sprink and the check, which requires approximately three weeks of care period; and (c) caused the injury to the victim C on the left sprink and the check, which require approximately two weeks of care period.

2. Although there are statements, photographs, diagnosis reports, etc. of victims as evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, the victims of the instant case were subjected to unilateral assault by the Defendant and the other party.

In relation to the assertion, it is difficult to entirely trust the statement, and it is limited to the fact that the victims suffered an injury only by the photograph and the written diagnosis of injury, and it is limited to what circumstances the victims suffered an injury.

Rather, according to witness E’s testimony at the scene of the case, at the time, the victims were engaged in flapsing or flapsing the Defendant, and the Defendant did not use violence as stated in the facts charged against the victims. Since E does not have any kind of relationship with the Defendant and victims, its statement is very reliable.