전자금융거래법위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
In light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and pleadings of this case, including the fact that the court below’s sentence (five million won of fine) is too unfluent and unfair, the prosecutor appealeds on the ground that the defendant did not have the same criminal history, and that the defendant seems to have actively known that the means of access in this case will be used for the crime of Bosing, even though considering the following factors: (a) the means of access in this case is used for the crime of Bosing; and (b) the strict punishment for the crime of Bosing is needed, the court below stated to the effect that the sentence imposed on the defendant is too unfluent and unfair (the defendant and his defense counsel are too unfluent, so it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable). In light of all the above sentencing conditions, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.