2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

A. On July 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) concluded a lease agreement with the Plaintiff on the lease deposit of KRW 120,000,000 and the lease term of KRW 24 months until September 8, 2018; and (b) received KRW 120,00,000,000 from the Plaintiff.

B. On July 16, 2015, the Defendant concluded a lease agreement with Plaintiff B on the lease deposit amount of KRW 80,000,000 among the above paragraph (1) and the lease deposit amount of KRW 80,000 from July 31, 2017. The Defendant received KRW 80,000,000 from Plaintiff B.

C. However, around August 8, 2018, Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B notified the Defendant of the termination of the lease agreement on September 8, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] A without any dispute, and each of the above facts stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 are liable to pay to plaintiff A KRW 120,000,000 and KRW 80,000 to plaintiff B.

2. The defendant's assertion is alleged to the effect that the defendant agreed to suspend the refund of deposit until the completion of the above lawsuit and the division of property with the plaintiffs while the divorce lawsuit is pending with the husband. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge this. Thus, the above argument is without merit.

3. The plaintiffs' claim is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.