beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2016.11.18 2016고단1182

명예훼손

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendants of the facts charged in the instant case were married to the couple, who operates a D cafeteria in the Damdong-gun apartment commercial building in the Yannam-gun, and the victim E is the head of the above apartment management office. The victim E is the head of the above apartment management office, and the person who works at the construction site next to the above apartment was filed a civil petition due to the problem of using the above apartment toilet more strus, and the construction company transferred the compensation for the use of the toilet to

1. Defendant A

A. On November 3, 2015, around 19:30 on November 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received the compensation as above from the victim, but did not resolve the problem of the shop toilet on the ground of the apartment management rules; (b) was disputing the victim’s request to change the apartment management rules; (c) while the F, which is an apartment security guard, received the payment from the company, damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out the facts, such as “an inferior feat, eargue,” sound, etc.

B. On November 18, 2015, around 20:00, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victim by publicly alleging that, at the house of 101 Dong Dong 802, the apartment as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a), “G received money from the construction company” and “G received money from the construction company.”

2. Defendant B

A. On November 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 11:00, at the place indicated in paragraph (1) on November 3, 2015, the victim received the compensation as above, but did not resolve the problem; and (b) requested the victim to resolve the problem as it does not make the cleaning well; (c) while there was a dispute with the victim as an apartment security guard, the Defendant made the victim’s hand and damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out the fact that the victim was “nicking at the seat of the f,” and pointing out the fact that the victim was “nicking at the seat of the f,” and that the victim was sexually disturbed.

B. The Defendant on November 2015.