However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On December 21, 2014, at around 01:05, the Defendant: (a) heard the victim C (here, 100,000 won or KRW 100,000,000,000 from the Defendant’s home located in Daegu-gun B apartment 103 Dong 1501, the Defendant 37 years of age) that “I sees the victim’s words “Is why Is why I would have been frighted to be frightd with his/her care,” and “Is the victim’s fright to be frightd, why I would have been frighted, and Is the victim’s face at the time of treatment three times.

2. The Defendant, upon receiving a report at a temporary location under Paragraph 1, voluntarily carried out the police box to the police box belonging to the Daegu Pacific Police Station and the police box, and returned home after undergoing a simple investigation.

However, upon arrival at the home, the Defendant filed a false report at the 112 reporting center of the National Police Agency via six times to the effect that “I do not have our house, Mala, Mada, and Malar thickness.”

Accordingly, the police officer again asked questions that “I would have made a false report despite why I would not have made a false report” if I would like to find the police officer as the defendant’s office, and there was no reason to believe that I would like to say that I would like to say that I would not make a false report, but there was evidence.”

The above police officer asked the defendant that "if you confirm the content of the recording of the report in the police station, you can know it clearly," and the defendant responded that "I will not be able to make a false report or take a responsibility for correspondence, or take a responsibility for it."

As a result, the Defendant found in a police box that contains false information and sought a recording file containing such false information, and assaulted the police officers at the place where the Defendant took the bath, such as “I am frith, I am spath, I am spath, I am spath, I am spath, I am spath, I am am spath to a slopeF, and am spathing two computer monitors.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the investigation of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. An interrogation protocol of the police against the accused (second time);

1. C, E, and F.