하자보수보증금
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 75,681,929 as well as 6% per annum from September 29, 2011 to April 12, 2013, and the next day.
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties is that the Plaintiff is a management organization composed of the occupants to manage the Red Confection apartment (one Dong 119 households, hereinafter “instant apartment”) located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul. The non-mixed construction corporation (hereinafter “non-mixed construction”) is a contractor that constructed the instant apartment, and the Defendant is a corporation that entered into a warranty contract with non-mixed construction to repair defects arising from the instant apartment.
B. (1) On April 20, 2006, non-mixed construction contracts entered into a warranty contract with the head of Seodaemun-gu with the insured as to the apartment of this case (hereinafter “each of the instant warranty contracts”) and entered into a warranty contract with the head of Seodaemun-gu with the defendant as to the apartment of this case, and deposit each of the warranty contracts issued by the defendant with the head of Seodaemun-gu with the approval authority.
The warranty warranty period of No. 100576, May 1, 2006 to April 30, 201 (5) 52,570,170 to April 1, 2006 to April 30, 201, each of the above warranty warranty warranty clause states that "no guarantee is liable for any defect that occurred prior to the warranty period, and the guarantee creditor shall be liable for any defect that occurred prior to the warranty period, and when organizing the council of occupants' representatives under Article 60 (2) of the Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act, the guarantee creditor shall be changed to the council of occupants' representatives."
(3) On May 26, 2006, non-mixed construction had undergone a pre-use inspection on the apartment of this case, and thereafter residents moved in the apartment of this case, and the plaintiff, which is the council of occupants' representatives of the apartment of this case, constituted the council of occupants' representatives, the guarantee creditor of each guarantee contract of this case, was changed to the plaintiff.
C. On the section for common use and section for exclusive use of the apartment of this case, there was a defect to the extent that the error in construction may hinder the safety of the aesthetic sense.
The plaintiff.