임대차보증금
1. The quasi-examination of this case shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Quasi-Review Plaintiff).
purport, purport, and.
1. Basic facts
A. On May 9, 2005, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on 16,000,000 won for the lease deposit and 2 years for the lease period (from May 11, 2005 to May 11, 2007), and filed a lawsuit seeking the return of the lease deposit on the grounds that the Defendant did not return the lease deposit, even though he/she requested the return of the lease deposit upon the expiration of the lease period on May 11, 2007.
B. The Defendant submitted an application to change the place of service on December 10, 2012, and failed to submit a written reply without an appearance on the date for pleading ( April 16, 2013) following the filing of the application.
C. On April 16, 2013, the Gwangju District Court rendered a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff that cited the entire purport of the above claim.
On October 30, 2013, the Defendant asserted that “The Plaintiff did not specify the instant real estate, continued to occupy the Plaintiff’s East D and mother, and extended the term of the lease contract orally,” on the grounds that the Defendant was unable to receive the notice of the date of pleading on October 30, 2013.”
E. The appellate court case (Seoul District Court 2013Na12026) was referred to conciliation on March 13, 2014 (Seoul District Court 2014Ma4012), and on April 3, 2014, the conciliation of the following (hereinafter “instant conciliation”) was concluded at the time when the Plaintiff and the Defendant were present at each of the Plaintiff and the Defendant B at each of their own meetings (the signature was completed until each of the Plaintiff and the Defendant confirmed), and in particular, paragraph 5 (5) (hereinafter “the purport of paying damages for each of 300,000 per day delay”) is that the Plaintiff and the Defendant prepared as “additional matters” at the time and signed thereon.
Accordingly, the protocol of mediation has been prepared.
1. The judgment of the first instance (the Gwangju District Court 2012 Ghana123205) shall be amended as follows:
2. The defendant.