If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

1. The Defendant, on August 19, 2016, was unable to pay 3,360 won of the taxi rate without good cause even when he/she was boarding a C-si operated by the injured party B on the four-distance street of the shopping mall in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 251, and used the said taxi to the apartment in the same Gu.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on the same day in front of the apartment apartment street, which is located in the Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, and the young young people.

“On the ground that the 112-report was sent and solicited by the head of the police station D police station border E to pay and return home for the fee, and that the said E was assaulted by both hand, namely, “I am X fe, but I am am fe.,” and assaulted the said E’s chest febbbbb by force twice.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting processing duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement of victim B;

1. A taxi charge receipt;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the place of work in the D District;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of official duties, choice of imprisonment), Article 3 (1) 39 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of freeboard, and choice of fine) concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and Article 38 (1) 3 of the same Act concerning the aggravation of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (limited to fines) for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (in the case of imprisonment, there is a need to severely punish a crime obstructing the performance of official duties in order to establish a legal order and eradicate the light of public authority, but the attitude to recognize and reflect the crime seems to have been punished twice, and the same crime has not been committed, and the degree of interference with the performance of official duties is significant.

Considering the fact that cannot be seen)